Episode III: Courtroom Alchemy — Discussion
This thread is dedicated to discussion of Episode III of SYSTEMIC: Courtroom Alchemy. Use this space to examine how courtroom architecture, procedural language, plea incentives, and administrative silence shape outcomes in the criminal justice system. Focus on observable practice: courtroom layout, judicial scripting, plea pressure, unrepresented defendants, vulnerability thresholds, and the diminishing role of juries. Contributions should reference concrete procedures, cases, policies, or lived experience where possible. Counter-arguments are welcome where grounded in evidence and articulated in good faith. Speculation, abuse, or unfounded claims are not appropriate here. I would particularly like to hear which courtroom rituals or practices most changed how you understand consent and fairness in criminal proceedings.
How to Participate
- If you choose ‘Challenge’ when replying to a person, begin with a Steel Man summary.
- Engage ideas, not individuals.
- Clarify before criticising.
- Protect clarity and intellectual honesty.
Full guidelines: TGK Community Charter .