The Gnostic Key | Zoë Speaks No.2 | The Franchise

Opening

The movement is waning. You can feel it if you have stood in both crowds, two years apart. The momentum has shifted, the numbers are down, and what is left tells you more than the numbers ever could. The diehards. The lager louts. The disgruntled youths. The Christian fundamentalists with their placards. The thugs with slashed faces. But also the retired police officer. The American lawyer quoting the Gospel of Thomas. The Iranian diaspora with professionally printed banners. The woman my age who loves the same music I do. The genuine patriots who just want their country back and have not quite worked out who took it. This was not one crowd. It was several, standing in the same street, handed the same script, with very different reasons for being there.

But something else has shifted too, and it is worth paying attention to. The crowd that remained is more ideologically sculpted than the one I stood in before. The anti-Islam architecture is more visible. The pro-Israel, pro-Iranian regime-change narrative is more organised, more professionally resourced, more deliberately inserted into what presents itself as a British nationalist movement. And most of the people absorbing it have absolutely no idea that is what is happening to them.

I know because I was one of them once. Not in that crowd specifically. But in the headspace. And I know what it feels like to be handed a frame and not realise you are inside it.

What I Saw

I spent a long time before the march moved off documenting the flags. You can learn a lot from the flags people fly at these types of events.

There was a strong Christian nationalist current running through the crowd. A flag depicting Christ on the cross surrounded by the apostles. Christ is King placards. Crosses being handed out to people who, if I had to bet, have not opened a Bible in their lives. And there, mid-crowd, flying alongside Union Jacks and Restore Britain flags, a black flag with a red cross and four smaller crosses in the corners.

The Jerusalem Cross.

I have seen that symbol before. On the chest of Pete Hegseth, the United States Secretary of Defence, as a tattoo. I wrote about it in Part One of this series, about what it means, what theology it signals, what project it belongs to. That flag was flying in Parliament Square on a Saturday afternoon while someone handed out leaflets with doctored scripture a few feet away.

That is not a coincidence. That is a transatlantic ideology made visible. Washington to Westminster. The same symbol. The same project. Different accent.

The Iranian diaspora presence was equally telling, and almost entirely unreported in the mainstream coverage. These were not casual attendees. Professionally printed banners reading “Iranian Refugee Message, Tommy Robinson Thank You For Supporting The Iranian People.” The pre-revolutionary Lion and Sun flag, the flag of the opposition to the Islamic Republic, carried alongside the Israeli flag, sometimes by the same person. “Ali Khamenei Is Dead / Trump Thank You” banners. This was an organised political insertion into a British nationalist rally, with a very specific agenda: regime change in Tehran. Who organised it? Who paid for the printing? Who facilitated the alliance between the Iranian diaspora opposition and the British far right? Nobody in the mainstream press thought to ask.

On the ground, the crowd was layered. The diehards. The families. The genuine patriots who just want their country back and have not quite worked out who took it. A contingent of people dressed as crusaders, chainmail, red St George capes, “This Is England Hear Us Roar” placards, doing medieval cosplay in Trafalgar Square with apparent sincerity. A man in a suit waving the Iranian flag outside Downing Street. A “Make Britain Great Again” cap. A placard reading “Halal and Kosher is Animal Cruelty, Animal Rights,” which was not really about animal rights.

And a strand, not dominant, but present and audible, chanting “fuck Palestine, fuck Israel, we just want our country back.” Which at least had the virtue of honesty about what it actually wanted, even as it sat in a crowd being funded by pro-Israel American money.

I will come back to the money.

The Leaflet on the Pavement

People were being handed leaflets. Most of them were on the floor within seconds, picked up, glanced at, dropped. I collected everything.

One leaflet was titled Common Sense: What the Bible Has to Say on the Issue of Immigration. Published by The Lord’s Work Trust, over 25,000 copies in print.

The back quoted Proverbs 5:1,7,9-10. The full chapter is Solomon warning his son against adultery. The "strangers" in verses 9-10 are the men who will profit from the son's ruin if he gives himself to another man's wife. It has nothing to do with immigration. Not loosely. Not metaphorically. Not at all. In this leaflet, the word "strangers" had been replaced with "strangers [migrants]." In brackets. Inserted. The moral agency of the original passage, your sin will destroy you, has been inverted into an external threat: they will take what is yours. The way Cyrus Scofield inserted his own interpretations into scripture in 1909 and changed the theological landscape of the Western world.

Nobody was reading it. But 25,000 copies exist. The Lord’s Work Trust gets to the King’s Coronation. They get to Unite the Kingdom 2024 and Unite the Kingdom 2026. They have a YouTube channel. They have a phone number. Someone is funding the print runs.

The other item I picked up was a copy of The Great Controversy, originally written by Ellen G. White, a Seventh-day Adventist, in 1888. This edition had been repackaged with the US Capitol and Vatican flag on the cover, subtitled “Will Two Former Rivals Unite?” I have seen this book distributed with multiple different covers at multiple different events. Someone is selecting this material, packaging it for different audiences, and funding its distribution at scale.

I am not saying everyone in that crowd is being consciously manipulated. I am saying the infrastructure of manipulation is visible, documentable, and being consistently ignored.

The Franchise

Let me tell you who built this.

I have been following Tommy Robinson for a while. Before October 7. Before Covid, even. Me and my sister attended some of the lockdown freedom marches. You have to go somewhere to understand it from the inside, and I make a habit of going to places that make people uncomfortable. That is how you learn what is actually happening.

What I did not sense back then was the blatant racism. What was being sold, and sold effectively, was pro-British, pro-freedom, anti-establishment. And for a working class woman who had plenty of legitimate grievances against the establishment, it had a certain pull.

It was not until post-October 7 that the really ugly stuff came out with a boldness it had not had before. Something shifted. The mask slipped, or maybe it just stopped bothering to stay on.

I remember watching the day Robinson was arrested outside the court during the grooming gangs trial. Live feed. I watched it with a former police officer. Neither of us could see a clear offence. What we could see was a man being removed from a situation that was becoming inconvenient for the establishment. Whatever Robinson is or has become, that did not look like justice.

There is a running thread through Robinson's career of trying and failing to walk away. From the EDL. From the far right label. Toward something closer to actual journalism. Each attempt has collapsed, sometimes because the establishment would not let him leave, sometimes because he walked back himself. He left the EDL in 2013. Thirteen years later every mainstream outlet still opens with "former EDL leader." The label has never come off. Whether that suits him or not at this point is a question worth asking.

At some point the money arrived. Robert Shillman, American tech billionaire, board member of Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, financed a fellowship that paid Robinson's salary at Rebel Media, the Canadian far-right outlet run by Ezra Levant. Robinson has since admitted that Levant "helped me, coached me, trained me, created me." The Middle East Forum, a pro-Israel think tank, contributed $60,000 to Free Tommy demonstrations. The Gatestone Institute, founded by Nina Rosenwald, published pieces defending him. And most recently, Elon Musk, the world's richest man, picked up nearly £100,000 in legal fees for Robinson's terrorism trial and reinstated his banned X account.

Whether he was pushed toward that money or walked toward it willingly, the effect is the same. The funding has a very specific agenda. And he is delivering it.

His supporters, many of them working class people with genuinely empty pockets, were donating their last tenner while he skirted around the world like he owned the place. Hearing them chant Tommy Tommy makes me cringe now. Not because they are bad people. Because they are being farmed.

This is not British nationalism. This is a franchise. Built with American pro-Israel money, coached by Canadian far-right media infrastructure, now bankrolled by the world’s richest man. The St George’s cross is the branding. The grievances are real. The management structure is transatlantic.

And the people in that crowd are the product.

The Grift

Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, Posie Parker, was on that stage. That surprised me more than almost anything else I saw on Saturday.

She built her platform on one argument: adult human female. That women's spaces, women's rights, women's legal protections belong to women. And she was right. In April 2025 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that under the Equality Act, woman means biological woman. The argument is settled in law.

She founded the Party of Women in 2023 to convert her platform into political power, originally announcing she would stand against Starmer himself. She ended up in Bristol Central instead, coming last with 196 votes, 0.5% of the electorate. A trans candidate standing independently in Aberdeen got more votes. She lost her deposit.

And now she is on a stage next to Tommy Robinson talking about getting Islam out of schools.

That is not conviction. That is a pivot. The argument she built her platform on is won. The political vehicle she built to capitalise on it went nowhere. And so here she is, on a stage next to Tommy Robinson, talking about getting Islam out of schools. When the original cause no longer provides a crowd, you find a new one. The crowd at a Tommy Robinson rally is not hard to read.

The specific target this time was Sir Hamid Patel CBE, interim chair of Ofsted, the schools inspectorate, appointed March 2025. A man knighted in 2021 for services to education. Chief Executive of Star Academies, a network of 36 schools across England, many serving disadvantaged communities, consistently rated Outstanding. An Ofsted board member since 2019. Appointed interim chair on merit, for a period of up to five months, while a permanent successor to Dame Christine Ryan is found.

The Education Secretary is Bridget Phillipson. A white woman. Not a Muslim.

A viral post claiming Sir Hamid had been made Minister of Education racked up 4.9 million views, with comments like "God can't save England anymore, only Allah may save." The crowd on Saturday was reacting, at least in part, to a fabrication.

The "Islam in schools" panic has no basis in reality. Religious Education has been a statutory requirement in every state school since 1988, covering Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism and Sikhism. That is not ideology. That is the law, unchanged across every government for nearly forty years. Sir Hamid Patel got his role because he is exceptionally qualified for it. The outrage directed at him is not about education. It is about his name and his faith. And the woman on that stage knew it.

What I Know From My Own Life

I was not really listening when a woman spoke from the stage about children in care. We were pushing through the crowd, trying to get through to meet friends. But certain words cut through regardless.

She was talking about grooming gangs. About children in care. About the predators who target vulnerable girls.

And something in me just went quiet. Not angry. Not upset. Just still. Because she was talking about me. A version of my story.

I was in care from around fifteen. And what happened to me there happened at the hands of an older white man. The care staff knew where I was going that night. They knew who I was going with. What I can tell you is that it happened. And I survived it the way girls survive things, not by fighting, not by screaming, but by getting through it. That is what we do. That is what we have always done. There is a name for it in psychology: fawning. When the threat is too big and the exit is blocked, you accommodate. You comply. You keep yourself safe the only way available to you.

I did report it. I was in the rape crisis centre, going through everything that entails, when the phone rang. This was before mobile phones. There was a private line in the room. Probably recorded, but at least private. Someone who loved me. Someone who knew the system from the inside. And he told me the truth: if I took it to court, they would destroy me. I would stand in that witness box and be taken apart. My character, my history, my credibility as a girl in care. That is how it works. That is how it has always worked.

So I made the calculation that girls have always made. And the man who did it walked free.

He had form. After the case was dropped I was openly accosted in the street by other young girls calling me a liar. That is how it works at ground level. The institution closes the door. The community locks it.

Not because of who he was. Because of who I was. A girl in care. The kind of girl the system has never quite managed to see as worth protecting.

That is the part that never makes it into the speeches. Not just the men who perpetrate these crimes, but the system that decides which victims deserve justice and which ones are too inconvenient. The courtrooms that read compliance as consent, not understanding that compliance was the only option available. The culture that has always found a way to make it the girl's fault.

The reason most girls keep their mouths shut is not weakness. It is pattern recognition. They have watched what happens to the ones who speak. They have done the maths. And they have decided that silence is safer than being destroyed twice, once by the man, once by the system built to protect him.

That system has no race. No religion. No postcode. It is the oldest establishment in Britain and it has been failing girls like me for as long as there have been girls like me.

Grooming gangs have existed forever. In every community. In every class. In every culture. The Epstein files tell you that. The hostage testimonies coming out of Israel tell you that, rape used as a weapon against men and women alike. The care system in 1990s Britain tells you that. What they all have in common is not race or religion. It is the way certain people are perceived by those with power over them. As objects. As available. As disposable.

You cannot fight that problem by screaming at a fraction of it. You cannot solve it by blaming brown men while white men walk free. And you cannot stand on a stage and weaponise the pain of girls who survived it to recruit a crowd into hatred.

That is not justice for them. That is just using them twice.

Two Conversations

Before the march, I shared an Uber with a man from Sierra Leone. Disgruntled, and fairly. He drives an electric car because he was told he would not pay road tax or congestion charges. The government lied. Now he cannot afford to drive into central London and his business is bleeding out. He talked about property ownership in Sierra Leone, how when you buy land there, you own it. When you die, they cannot take it from you. Here, he said, you never truly own anything.

He is right. That is not an immigrant’s complaint. That is an indictment of a system that has been enclosing the commons since the 1600s, just with better branding.

After the march, on the way home, another Uber. A Pakistani man who splits his time between here and home, three months on, three months off. Runs an MOT place. Was telling us about the new diagnostic technology that pipes data directly to government, the compliance costs that keep rising while the margins keep shrinking. He and my companion ended up deep in a conversation about cars, brakes, emissions, the kind of talk that crosses every boundary that crowd in Parliament Square had spent the day trying to enforce.

Two men. Both working. Both paying taxes. Both navigating a system that makes it harder every year to do so. Both having the kinds of conversations that were absolutely not supposed to happen.

Before the march, a man from Sierra Leone told me I never truly own anything in this country. After the march, a Pakistani man talked shop like old friends. In between, 60,000 people were told those men are the problem.

The Pub Conversation

We met friends at a pub after the march. Three of them were voting Restore Britain, including my dad. One of them was keen to talk politics.

I told her I voted Green. Twice. Not because I am a Green voter by conviction but because I refuse to vote for an establishment that has nothing in common with me and knows it.

I mentioned that one of the reasons I voted Green was their harm reduction policy. That landed us on the Mersey Harm Reduction Model, Liverpool, mid-1980s. Clean needles. Methadone prescribing. Outreach workers going into communities. The police not prosecuting people for possessing needles. The result: an HIV epidemic among injecting drug users did not happen in Merseyside. Crime fell. In 1990, Marks and Spencer sponsored the world's first international harm reduction conference in Liverpool, after seeing a dramatic fall in shoplifting at their local stores as a direct result of the programme.

It worked. The British clinics were shut down in 1995 because America wanted its war on drugs and we toed the line as we always do. Portugal took the model and ran with it. We are still counting the bodies.

She did not agree with me. We walked out having found more common ground than either of us expected: same age, same music, same festivals, same anger at a system that has let us both down. Just pointed in different directions about who to blame. That conversation is exactly what they are trying to prevent. I hope she comes back to it.

The Separated Crowds

While 60,000 people marched with Tommy Robinson, 30,000 marched for Palestine half a mile away. It was Nakba Day, the 78th anniversary of the displacement of 700,000 Palestinians in 1948.

The Metropolitan Police deployed 4,000 officers, armoured vehicles, horses, dogs, drones and helicopters at a cost of £4.5 million to keep the two demonstrations apart.

Meanwhile, Palestine Action, a group whose entire history of activism involves property damage, not violence against people, has been proscribed as a terrorist organisation. The first time in British history a group has been designated terrorist solely on the basis of property damage. They sit on the same legal list as al-Qaeda and ISIS. <a href=”https://www.met.police.uk/” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener noreferrer”>Over 2,000 people have been arrested for holding signs reading “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.” Former vicars. Doctors. Teachers. Pensioners. The High Court has since ruled the proscription unlawful and disproportionate. The government is appealing.

Tommy Robinson was given Parliament Square.

I am not saying the police are on his side. I am saying the state made a choice about which crowd gets the square and which crowd gets the cordon. On Nakba Day. Make of that what you will.

The people in both crowds are angry. They are angry about the same things, about being lied to, about the cost of living, about a government that serves interests other than theirs, about a system that takes and never delivers. They have been kept half a mile apart and told the other crowd is the enemy.

That separation is not incidental. It is the product. While the two crowds are kept apart, the people who caused the problems continue uninterrupted.

The American Tourist

Before the march I fell into conversation with an American couple, a lawyer and his wife, recently moved from New York to Kensington. Pleasant. Articulate. Clearly not short of money. His hat said "1776 to present."

1776. The founding of America. The date the story officially begins, according to a certain telling.

One hundred and fifty-seven years before that, in August 1619, the first ship carrying enslaved Africans arrived at Point Comfort, Virginia. The people who built America before America had a name do not appear on the hat.

She had her own story. Involved with the Pink Ladies movement, runs her own tequila brand. A friend who was with them had been accosted by someone they described as an illegal immigrant since arriving in London. That sparked a conversation about self-defence, specifically that women in this country have no legal means of protecting themselves. They are right about that. It is why women walk to their cars holding their keys between their fingers. America has pepper spray. We have nothing. Both of them were vocally anti-Mamdani. Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist mayor of New York, in office and already being described in that crowd as an existential threat.

He talked about what happens when you do not "get a handle on your Muslim population." The UK Muslim population is 6.5%. Six and a half percent. He described this as an existential threat to Western civilisation. They had left New York, moved to London, a city run by a Muslim mayor for four consecutive terms, apparently without noticing.

When I handed him a TGK card he lit up. He knew exactly what the Gnostic Key meant. Started talking about the Gospel of Thomas, quoting it, engaging with it properly. This was not a man who had stumbled into an ideology. This was a man who had gone looking for something real and ended up here.

He kept saying my wife will love this, my wife wanted to come today. And I understood that dynamic immediately. He was there to understand it. She was there because it was her home. The same distance I navigate with my dad, just with the positions flipped.

I told him that whether you are white, brown, Muslim, Black or anything else, the grievance is the same: none of us are happy with how we are being governed. And the reason we never have that conversation across the divide is that the divide is the point. As long as we are fighting each other, we are not fighting the people running the game.

He handed the card to his wife. I hope she reads it. I think he already understood it.

What Starmer Got Right

I will say something that will surprise people who think they know where I stand.

I came into this expecting the worst. Based on Iraq, based on Blair, based on what I have watched Labour do when America comes calling, I expected Starmer to find a way to drag us into the war being waged against Iran on Israel's behalf. I was wrong.

As long as Keir Starmer leads this government, we will not be dragged into an Israeli-backed American invasion of Iran. He has held that line under enormous pressure, including from 60,000 people in Parliament Square chanting for his removal. I did not expect this. I am saying so publicly, with my full chest, because that is what intellectual honesty requires.

That is probably why there is such a desperate push to remove him. The money funding that rally needs a British government that will play along. Starmer will not. And a significant number of the people chanting for his removal on Saturday would, if they got what they wanted, live to see their children sent to fight someone else's war for land and oil and money.

Again.

Why TGK Exists

I built The Gnostic Key because of exactly what I witnessed on Saturday.

I have had the privilege of talking to people across every part of the political spectrum. People who have been dragged from one side to the other and back again. People whose anger is real and whose grievances are legitimate even when their conclusions are wrong. And what becomes obvious when you actually have those conversations, when you sit across from someone and listen rather than perform, is that there are good ideas in every camp. Real ones. Ideas that could actually solve things.

The reason those ideas never meet is not accidental. It is the point. While the problems remain unsolved, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, the divide widens, the excuses multiply, the anger grows. And the angry people end up defending the billionaires who are exploiting them. Praising an aristocracy that is still enclosing the commons four hundred years later. Marching for a movement funded by American money to fight a war that will consume their children.

I love this country. With full knowledge of what it has done and what it has been.

The colonialism. The genocide. The theft of land and people and resources that sit in museums built for tourists to admire things that were never theirs. If you want to see Egyptian mummies, go to Egypt. If you want to see the Koh-i-Noor, go to India.

But the people. The actual people of this island. We are genuinely good. Kind. Tolerant. Funny. Forgiving. We understand nuance when we are allowed to. We forced our government to end slavery, that was not the establishment’s idea, that was ours. We gave women the vote because women fought until the establishment had no choice.

We have made horrendous mistakes. We sold Palestine down the river. We helped overthrow Iran’s democracy in 1953. We sent young people to die in Afghanistan and Iraq for lies dressed as liberation. But that was our government. Not us.

What pains me most is that most of the people arriving on boats to this country would rather be at home. With their families. In the places they were born. But what is left of those places? Bombed in wars built on lies. Stripped of resources by corporations with government protection. Destabilised by intelligence operations dating back decades. The refugees are not the cause of our problems. They are the evidence of them.

Until we hold that truth honestly, until we are willing to look at what has been done in our name and reckon with it, we will keep blaming the people arriving for the damage done by the people who sent them.

That is why The Gnostic Key exists.

You cannot dismantle a system you do not understand. You cannot build something better until you can see clearly how the current one works, who it serves, and why it needs the two crowds kept half a mile apart and never allowed to speak.

That is what I went to Parliament Square to document on Saturday.

That is what I am telling you now.

Zoë Hall is the founder of The Gnostic Key. She writes under the editorial identity Zoë Speaks. Photography by the author unless otherwise credited.

Resources

Primary reporting, official statements, and historical references used in this piece.

📑 References

• [1] The Lord’s Work Trust leaflet details

  :Publication details referenced from leaflet imprint and distribution context.

• [2] Bible passage reference: Proverbs 5:1,7,9-10

  :Canonical source for the quoted chapter and verses.

• [3] Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy (1888 origin)

  :Primary text reference for publication lineage.

• [4] David Horowitz Freedom Center reporting on the Shillman Fellowship and Tommy Robinson support

  :Funding context tied to Robinson’s media period.

• [5] Rebel Media / Ezra Levant commentary and Robinson interview statements

  :Source material for Robinson’s quote on Levant’s role.

• [6] Middle East Forum reporting on financial support to Free Tommy demonstrations

  :Source for the cited $60,000 contribution figure.

• [7] Gatestone Institute publications connected to Tommy Robinson coverage

  :Editorial trail used for the institute reference.

• [8] Coverage of Elon Musk legal-fee support and X account reinstatement (November 2025 period)

  :Reporting around legal support and account reinstatement chronology.

• [9] UK Supreme Court judgment clarifying sex and legal definitions

  :Primary legal text relevant to the ‘adult human female’ claim context.

• [10] UK General Election 2024 result, Bristol Central

  :Official constituency result confirming vote share and deposit outcome.

• [11] Ofsted announcement appointing Sir Hamid Patel as interim chair (March 2025)

  :Official appointment notice and scope.

• [12] Star Academies profile and network information

  :Reference for network scale and leadership context.

• [13] Honours record references for Sir Hamid Patel (CBE, knighthood)

  :Public honours records.

• [14] Department for Education ministerial listings (Education Secretary: Bridget Phillipson)

  :Current ministerial officeholder reference.

• [15] Pat O’Hare (2007), early harm reduction history in Merseyside

  :International Journal of Drug Policy reference on Merseyside and early harm reduction conferences.

• [16] Transform Drug Policy Foundation: Drug decriminalisation in Portugal, setting the record straight

  :Primary source for the Portugal drug-death comparison data used in this piece.

• [17] Office for National Statistics: Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales, 2024 registrations

  :Official statistics confirming the 9.39 per 100,000 drug-poisoning mortality rate cited in this piece.

• [18] The New York Times 1619 Project (Nikole Hannah-Jones)

  :Reference point for 1619 framing.

• [19] Metropolitan Police statement on 16 May 2026 protest policing

  :Operational deployment figures, arrests, and public-order framing for the London demonstrations.

• [20] UK Government proscription action concerning Palestine Action (July 2025), with subsequent High Court ruling and appeal updates

  :Official and legal timeline for proscription, ruling, and appeal status.

• [21] Metropolitan Police and Greater Manchester Police updates on protest-slogan enforcement approach (December 2025)

  :Public statements on enforcement thresholds and operational posture.

• [22] Muslim Council of Britain summary using 2021 Census data

  :Reference for UK Muslim population share.

• [23] US National Security Archive material on Operation Ajax (Iran, 1953)

  :Declassified-document hub on CIA/MI6 coup operations.

📖 Scholarly Sources & Translations

• Pat O’Hare (2007). Merseyside, the First Harm Reduction Conferences, and the Early History of Harm Reduction. International Journal of Drug Policy, 18(2), 141-144.

Photographs, leaflet captures, and symbol documentation cited in this piece were recorded by the author at Parliament Square, London, 16 May 2026. Jerusalem Cross image context is additionally linked to Zoë Speaks No.1.

These sources are provided for verification, study and context. They represent diverse perspectives and are offered as reference points, not as doctrinal positions.

Support The Gnostic Key

If this work helps you, a small contribution keeps the archive alive.